2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1956 Renault Juva
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,499 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 320 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 1956 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 1956 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Colt | Juva |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2360 mm |
