2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,689 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Plymouth Valiant weights approximately 240 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1963 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Plymouth |
| Model | Colt | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3689 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1305 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
