2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1967 Willys-Overland Dauphine
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Willys-Overland Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Willys-Overland Dauphine would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Willys-Overland Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Willys-Overland Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 1967 Willys-Overland Dauphine | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Willys-Overland |
Model | Colt | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2280 mm |