2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1978 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 175 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (146 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 1978 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | Mark II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2590 mm |