2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1983 Peugeot 505
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Peugeot 505. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Peugeot 505 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Peugeot 505 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Peugeot 505 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Peugeot 505. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 1983 Peugeot 505 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Peugeot |
Model | Colt | 505 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2750 mm |