2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1985 Renault 18
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 18 would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Renault 18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1985 Renault 18. (63 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 18.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 18. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 1985 Renault 18 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | 18 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1322 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |