2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mitsubishi Colt 1996 Rover 200
Make Mitsubishi Rover
Model Colt 200
Year Released 2004 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 94 HP 103 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1065 kg 1075 kg
Vehicle Length 3880 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2510 mm