2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2000 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan El Grand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan El Grand would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 970 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 2000 Nissan El Grand | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Colt | El Grand |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
