2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, both 2004 Mitsubishi Colt and 2004 Nissan Armada were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1274 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (100 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Colt | Armada |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 106 L |