2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 555 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Kia |
Model | Colt | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2845 mm |