2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,493 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (99 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (220 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Colt | Aveo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 46 L |