2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 275 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mini |
| Model | Colt | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 47 L |
