2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse (147 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse weights approximately 455 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse (214 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Eclipse | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2376 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2420 mm |
