2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse weights approximately 165 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (214 Nm). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Eclipse | Celica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2640 mm |
