2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 2008 Nissan Terrano
To start off, 2008 Nissan Terrano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Terrano weights approximately 350 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Because 2008 Nissan Terrano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Terrano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 279 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 2008 Nissan Terrano | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Eclipse | Terrano |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2664 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 279 Nm | 279 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 72 L |