2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 135 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (214 Nm). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mini |
| Model | Eclipse | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |
