2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1952 Renault Juva
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,003 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Renault Juva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Renault Juva weights approximately 20 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1952 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1952 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1952 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1952 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | eK | Juva |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1003 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2360 mm |
