2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1963 Morris Minor
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morris Minor would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Morris Minor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Morris Minor weights approximately 35 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1963 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1963 Morris Minor | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Morris |
Model | eK | Minor |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2190 mm |