2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1963 Steyr 500D
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 500D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 500D would be higher. At 657 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi eK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi eK weights approximately 310 kg more than 1963 Steyr 500D.
Because 1963 Steyr 500D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Steyr 500D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1963 Steyr 500D has manual transmission. 1963 Steyr 500D will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1963 Steyr 500D | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Steyr |
Model | eK | 500D |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 19 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 1850 mm |