2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1965 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph Vitesse weights approximately 90 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1965 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1965 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
Model | eK | Vitesse |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2270 mm |