2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1968 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi eK weights approximately 80 kg more than 1968 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1968 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1968 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | eK | Corolla |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2290 mm |