2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1970 Volvo 145
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Volvo 145 weights approximately 500 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1970 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1970 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | eK | 145 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2620 mm |