2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1972 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 885 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi eK weights approximately 50 kg more than 1972 ZAZ 966.
Because 1972 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1972 ZAZ 966 has manual transmission. 1972 ZAZ 966 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1972 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | ZAZ |
| Model | eK | 966 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 885 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2170 mm |
