2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1982 BMW 318
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 318. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 318 would be higher. At 1,765 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 BMW 318 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 318 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1982 BMW 318 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 318. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1982 BMW 318 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | BMW |
Model | eK | 318 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1765 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2580 mm |