2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Seat Ronda weights approximately 146 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1982 Seat Ronda has manual transmission. 1982 Seat Ronda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | eK | Ronda |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2460 mm |