2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 585 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 1998 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | eK | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2750 mm |