2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2010 Ford Escape
To start off, 2010 Ford Escape is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Escape weights approximately 1060 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 2010 Ford Escape | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | eK | Escape |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2824 mm |