2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi eK | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | eK | F-250 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3967 mm |