2004 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2013 BMW X5
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 weights approximately 1565 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2013 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi eK | 2013 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | BMW |
| Model | eK | X5 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4857 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2197 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1776 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2933 mm |
