2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 108 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Because 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Endeavor | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 81 L |
