2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 655 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
| Model | Endeavor | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
