2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 585 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Endeavor | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
