2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 244 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Endeavor | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3828 cc | 5736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1854 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2960 mm |
