2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 759 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Celica. (152 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Endeavor | Celica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 88.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 58 L |
