2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Endeavor | 66 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
