2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 923 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Endeavor | 9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.1 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 38 L |