2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (339 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Endeavor | SS |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 68 L |