2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (339 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Panoz |
| Model | Endeavor | Q9 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 59 L |
