2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2001 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 731 kg more than 2001 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2001 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Endeavor | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 45 L |