2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,998 cc, 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 525 kg more than 2002 Spyker C8.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Spyker |
| Model | Endeavor | C8 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3835 cc | 3998 cc |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 100 L |
