2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Endeavor | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 90 L |