2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2010 Citroen C8
To start off, 2010 Citroen C8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C8. (156 HP @ 5650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 225 kg more than 2010 Citroen C8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Citroen C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C8. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2010 Citroen C8 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Citroen |
Model | Endeavor | C8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 2230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 80 L |