2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2013 BMW M3
To start off, 2013 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW M3 (408 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW M3 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW M3 (400 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (339 Nm). This means 2013 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2013 BMW M3 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | BMW |
Model | Endeavor | M3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 408 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 400 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 12.0 : 1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1976 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1392 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2761 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 63 L |