2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 774 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Endeavor | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2649 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5842 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1638 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3570 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 100 L |
