2004 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 1962 Rover P5
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Rover P5 (119 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi L 200. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi L 200.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Rover P5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Rover P5. (218 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi L 200 | 1962 Rover P5 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | L 200 | P5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2350 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2820 mm |