2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 702 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (176 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
Model | Lancer | Fronte |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 32 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 66 L |