2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (164 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1976 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 170 kg more than 1976 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Datsun 280Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Datsun 280Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (210 Nm). This means 1976 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer 1976 Datsun 280Z
Make Mitsubishi Datsun
Model Lancer 280Z
Year Released 2004 1976
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2376 cc 2753 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 164 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 221 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 8.3:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 1200 kg
Vehicle Length 4610 mm 4399 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1631 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2304 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]