2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1982 Reliant Kitten

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Reliant Kitten. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Reliant Kitten would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (164 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Reliant Kitten. (40 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1982 Reliant Kitten. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 835 kg more than 1982 Reliant Kitten. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Reliant Kitten is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Reliant Kitten. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (210 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Reliant Kitten. (63 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Reliant Kitten.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer 1982 Reliant Kitten
Make Mitsubishi Reliant
Model Lancer Kitten
Year Released 2004 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2376 cc 846 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 164 HP 40 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 63 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 62.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 69.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 535 kg
Vehicle Length 4610 mm 3330 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1430 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 27 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]