2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2005 Renault Clio

To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 135 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (177 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 Renault Clio
Make Mitsubishi Renault
Model Lancer Clio
Year Released 2004 2005
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1149 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 74 HP
Torque 177 Nm 105 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1225 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2690 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 6.7 L/100km 4.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 8.4 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 55 L