2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (164 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (210 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Citroen |
Model | Lancer | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2376 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 232 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |